"Ocean Towers are twin, 5-star highrise Co-op towers near the beach in beautiful Santa Monica, CA. As a result, Spahi claimed loss of rental income and an inability to sell one of his units for $2.2 million. Proc. Ocean Towers is a 317-unit luxury cooperative apartment building high-rise located at 201 Ocean Avenue. Or maybe Raba did not analyze "group pile" settlement models? hXrH}+Q$Y#o> hM`+ {z>cw?x. =U:y2O7:}c(#J0a?sGHL%GU_o#]n&/v4P,}s{OBeo~3,[G#Lj=*}0-PN->3}b)f|vpqP 4(. The statements alleged by the Spahis certainly impugned their personal reputations with accusations of dishonesty and improper and illegal conduct such as withholding security deposits, the panel of judges stated in their ruling. Both surviving causes of action are based on an alleged breach of written purchase agreements subject to a four-year statute of limitations. Cancellation and Refund Policy, Privacy Policy, and Filed: April 28, 2023 as 2:2019cv06106. [6], The developers have filed a $125 million lawsuit against geotechnical engineering firm Raba-Kistner Engineering and Consulting of San Antonio and structural engineers Datum Engineers of Austin and Dallas. Regarding the demurrer, the primary right doctrine at issue in that ruling is distinct from the exclusive concurrent jurisdiction doctrine at issue here. Id. A primary right is the right to be free from a particular injury, regardless of the legal theory on which liability for the injury is based. Gillies v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank NA (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 907, 914. Plant Insulation Co. v. Fibreboard Corp. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 781. 54 0 obj <>stream The hi-rise included a 4-level parking garage immediately adjacent and connected to it. hbbd``b`j@ H0G @H L@ 3 Glade v. Glade (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1441, 1449 where a proceeding has been . Beginning in 2016, a series of lawsuits were filed concerning a 56-story condominium tower, colloquially referred to as "San Francisco's Leaning Tower," which has vertically moved more than 16 inches and is tilting as much as 20 inches. The Retro-style Diner Will Open Shop Back Up on Wilshire Boulevard and Expand Into the Old Vienna Bakery Space. NOTE: The information and commentary contained in this database entry are based on court filings and other informational sources that may contain unproven allegations made by the parties. All to prevent us from getting approval for the original foreclosed unit. Punitive damages may not be granted in an action based on breach of contract, even if the defendants breach was willful or fraudulent. Crogan v. Metz (1956) 47 Cal.2d 398, 405. ;128.7(b)(1), (4). Cal. VS JOHN SPAHI, ET AL. Saturday, October 10, 2009 Ocean Tower Settlement and Implosion In 2006 construction began on the 31-story condo building known at the "Ocean Tower" . The court sustained defendants demurrer to the first cause of action on the grounds that it was based on the same primary right as the original action and overruled the demurrer to the second and third causes of action. This is not well-taken. LEONARD LUDOVICO VS OCEAN TOWERS HOUSING CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. [3] It continued for two years with much of the main structure completed until differential settlement saw parts of the building sink by over 14 inches (360mm). There is no Misappropriation of Funds, and John Spahi is not the CEO, for starters. It was nicknamed "Faulty Towers" and "The Leaning Tower of South Padre Island". HAPI FOUNDATION, ET AL. The court granted final approval of the proposed settlement in the class action on August 7, 2020. Description. In 2015, an HOA shareholder filed a derivative complaint against Spahi and his alleged alter egos and co-conspirators, alleging breach of his duties as director and fraud on the HOA. Tree of Life Memorial In Palisades Park Celebrates Life of Marissa Rubin, Wife of Jerry Rubin. Nonetheless, they arise out of the same subject matter purchase agreements entered by Spahis alleged alter egos and seek the same damages the costs incurred by the HOA in defending against the US Bank litigation. The nearby Texas Park Road 100 was closed on safety grounds just before the building was set to be razed. 0000026701 00000 n . A fifth amended complaint (5AC) was filed in the 2015 action on October 16, 2019. In the meantime, Spahi broke into the unit and illegally started renting it for thousands of dollars while he filed another false lawsuit against the bank who legally owned the unit. 0000305624 00000 n will keep Verizon from solving a "significant gap in its coverage," triggering . Section 128.7 does not apply to disclosures and discovery requests, responses, objections, and motions. Cal. SMart (Santa Monica Architects for a Responsible Tomorrow) Last week's column was Part 1. The remaining causes of action are not based on the alleged scheme but on defendants failure to indemnify plaintiff as required under the purchase agreements. No punitive damages may be recovered even if the facts alleged complaint amount to fraud. 0000002075 00000 n Ingos Kevin Bludsos New Barbecue Location Will Be 1.5 Miles Away From the Pier. Follow us on Twitter. When a party properly requests affirmative relief by demurrer or answer or by motion to dismiss, stay or transfer on the grounds of exclusive concurrent jurisdiction, the second court loses jurisdiction over the subject matter and cannot issue rulings on the merits. "there is sufficient evidence to show misappropriation of funds," she said. Contact: Doug Elmets. 0000210744 00000 n These easy peasy blog commenting tips will drive mad traffic to your blog. In 2018, a receiver was appointed to operate the HOA, and Spahi was removed as a board member. Palisades News. Case No. Who knows, right now all i can say is that a geotechnical report for a project of this magnitude is usually written by one engineer and reviewed by another more senior engineer. John Spahi was never CEO of Ocean Towers. Proc. Plaintiff argues defendant violated Cal. The lawsuit alleges that Spahi, who now owns a controlling interest and 40 units in the property, misappropriated $11 million out of $50 million FEMA paid Ocean Towers to make repairs after the 1994 Northridge earthquake.". ", "Ocean Towers are twin, 5-star highrise Co-op towers near the beach in beautiful Santa Monica, CA. 0000103877 00000 n hUQo0+=0N8RtHkhxHL!AI?M e]SYV;by@Q0?>xU RxL)PNp%pWJdynE)0Z0}r*:*yV(b E(0MP4-E^IvldN~ R-9;RMs~7_qZ*- %`o0l8or A trial court reportedly dismissed the lawsuit. . 0000008813 00000 n This place is a mess and we are so greatful that our escrow never closed. SC124263 (the original action) pending in Dept. I would love to see the calculations by Raba-Kistner and by the structural engineer to find out the root cause of the flawed design (errors and omissions anyone). As an alternative reason for dismissal, Stone argued that his statements were priviliged because they litigation or were protected communications between parties who share an "interest" in an The suit names as defendants all three of Ocean Tower's contractors: engineering firms Raba-Kistner Consultants Inc., based in San Antonio, and Datum Engineering Inc., based in Austin, as well as Delaware based Zachry Construction Corp. This action involves plaintiffs contractual rights, while the 2015 action concerns plaintiffs right to be free from fraudulent/disloyal conduct by directors. When the agreements were executed, the units were subject to liens in favor of the HOAs lenders. Proc. The language does not affirmatively state any of the identified categories exists but is a broad denial that neither defendant nor anyone associated with defendant harmed plaintiff. HOPKINS v. By signing and filing a pleading or motion, an attorney certifies the filing is not being presented primarily for an improper purpose, and that [t]he denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence[. Disabled Veterans Still Homeless After VA Opens New Housing, Police Investigate Assault at Santa Monica Restaurant, Suspect Still at Large, Mayor Karen Bass Releases Statement Regarding The Death of Former Mayor Richard Riordan, Councilmember Traci Park Advises Westside Residents To Tune In To Budget And Finance Meetings On Proposed Budget For The City, Los Angeles Delays Spending Most of the Funds Raised by Mansion Tax Until Legal Challenges Are Resolved. LA COURT CONNECT IS NOW AVAILABLE. Did that happen? A lone drill rig sits at the stalled construction site for Hawaii City Plaza at 730 Sheridan St. Prev Next. Based on the investigation findings, the tower was imploded before construction completion. 2021-06-22. Defendant Spahi filed the motion to stay, which is granted, per the courts prior tentative. Or maybe they did include end bearing capacity but didnt realize that the piles would end up 95 feet deep, just 5 feet above deepest exploration depth? . 0000008359 00000 n Cal. Yelp, Inc. v. Hadeed Carpet Cleaning, Inc. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority v. Anderson, Kessler International v. Citizen Media Law Project, New York County v. Twitter, Inc. (subpoena), Suffolk County District Attorney's Office v. Twitter, Inc. (subpoena), Seven Years of Serving and Studying the Legal Needs of Digital Journalism, DMLP Announcement: A New Report on Media Credentialing in the United States. 0000010581 00000 n 0000001976 00000 n 0000006486 00000 n This caused increasing levels of damage to the structural system due to load redistribution and overload of structural elements. He straight out explained to us that the above was the reason that we were not getting approved. During the forensic investigation, Walter P Moore performed a detailed evaluation and used computer modeling to analyze causation of failure, as well as predict future failure of structural elements. Jones Day represented Transbay Joint Powers Authority ("TJPA"), one of the primary parties in the Millennium Tower litigation, which is one of the highest profile litigation matters in the United States. Additionally, even if the court accepted plaintiffs interpretation, plaintiff does not adequately justify imposition of such an extreme remedy as entry of default. Due to popular demand the Berkman Klein Center is keeping the website online, but. If you do not agree with these terms, then do not use our website and/or services. July 10, 2008 - 5:40PM. This litigation, involving a signature project in San Francisco with a number of well-known unit owners, including former 49ers' quarterback Joe Montana, was featured on a segment on 60 Minutes and heavily covered by local and national print and broadcast media. 0000134847 00000 n Judicial Foreclosure; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff); Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), DocketNotice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice; Filed by Clerk, DocketCivil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), DocketComplaint; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), DocketSummons (on Complaint); Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), DocketNotice of Case Assignment - Unlimited Civil Case; Filed by Clerk, DocketNotice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk, Case Number: *******0918 Hearing Date: August 07, 2020 Dept: P, Ocean Towers Housing Corporation v. Seif Ascar et al. And anyone who challenges him is immediately sued," she said.". We are looking for contributing authors with expertise in media law, intellectual property, First Amendment, and other related fields to join us as guest bloggers. It appears that a settlement was reached. Ocean Tower SPI was an unfinished, 31-story condominium in South Padre Island, Cameron County, Texas, United States, that was imploded when it was deemed unsafe to remain standing. Os rejection of the notice of related case is not preclusive. Ocean Towers has taken on 3 loan since that time and has passed all due diligence from all the lenders. To read this as a knowing misrepresentation under ;128.7 would require a narrow, counterintuitive reading. In 2015 Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (HOA) shareholder Michael Reach filed a derivative complaint, case no. Judicial Foreclosure; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff); Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), Notice of Case Reassignment and Order for Plaintiff to Give Notice; Filed by Clerk, Civil Case Cover Sheet; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), Complaint; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), Summons (on Complaint); Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), Notice of Case Assignment - Unlimited Civil Case; Filed by Clerk, Notice of Case Management Conference; Filed by Clerk. Venice " The lawsuit alleges that Spahi, who now owns a controlling interest and 40 units in the property, misappropriated $11 million out of $50 million FEMA paid Ocean Towers to make repairs after the 1994 Northridge earthquake." . ;128.7. The fact that the parties in two actions are different does not preclude application of the rule if the two actions share a subject matter. This is all false, none of this has been alleged in any formal document in the case pending. Under the transaction test from, By signing and filing a pleading or motion, an attorney certifies the filing is not being presented primarily for an improper purpose, and that [t]he denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence[. A posted article about Ocean towers contains a ton of false information, I'd love a chance to discuss with the author and set the record straight. (the original action) pending in Dept. GRANTED. Code of Civ. She continued the hearing to June 27 and recommended that the two parties, John Spahi and Michael Reach, attempt to settle their dispute. Traffic, ITS, and Transportation Planning. 0000002989 00000 n The HOA could seek to enforce the purchase agreements, even if plaintiff did not allege defendants misused their positions as HOA directors. . Both surviving causes of action arise out of an alleged contract breach. Spahi argues the new allegations action overlap significantly with the current action, involve the same plaintiff, subject matter and primary defendant, requiring a stay. I also question the length to diameter ratio, it is pretty slender (95/1.33 = 71). I think 401 16-inch diameter auger-cast piles were revealed to be under the hi-rise building footprint. They are contractual and do not depend on any allegation of fraud or undue influence by HOA directors. This man controlled who was able to buy and sell in his building. Code of Civ. Contrary to plaintiffs argument, the courts prior denial of defendants notice of related cases and demurrer has no preclusive effect. Construction activity ceased immediately because of the public safety risk and potential for partial collapse. 0000007060 00000 n ge9O^Vr|9o+tE@sDkth%U&8ViY?=eI(ekTj17Z78]/b,?u:N}(kaYC9fh31]2zg()M Plaintiff adequately alleges alter ego liability, allowing this cause of action to proceed against Spahi. A plaintiff cannot divide a primary right and enforce it in two suits, including when the first suit is still pending when the second is filed[. The litigation is still on-going and the matter has not been adjudicated fully yet. In August 2019, the parties informed the court that a tentative and conditional global settlement was agreed upon. Spahi concedes the primary right at issue in the 2015 action is the HOAs right to be governed by honest and faithful directors, who were duty-bound to act in good faith and in the best interests of the corporation. Opposition at pg. 2022-06-10, Los Angeles County Superior Courts | Contract | However, different primary rights are at stake here versus the other action. Defendant seeks sanctions against plaintiff, arguing this motion was brought for an improper purpose. Proc. It was designed as a 31-story luxury high-rise featuring 147 residences, a gym, swimming pools, spa, and a media room. "That $11 million has never been accounted for," one resident told us. "We believe that he used the money to acquire more units for himself because he appointed himself CEO of the co-op corporation and could do whatever he wanted or felt he could. Brentwood News Additionally, a notice of related cases does not have estoppel effect. 01/22/2020 at 08:30 AM in Department P at 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Case Management Conference, Amended Objections to Plaintiff's Notice of Deposition of Person Most Qualified at Defendant Windsor Ocean, Inc.; Filed by Windsor Ocean, Inc. (Defendant), Notice of Ruling; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), at 08:30 AM in Department P; Case Management Conference - Held - Continued, at 08:30 AM in Department P; Hearing on Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Held - Motion Granted, at 08:30 AM in Department P; Hearing on Demurrer - with Motion to Strike (CCP 430.10) - Held - Motion Granted, Minute Order ( (Case Management Conference; Defendant John Spahi's Demurrer -)); Filed by Clerk, Declaration (of Herbert Nacion re: Payment and Submission of Pro Hac Vice Application to State Bar of CA); Filed by John Spahi (Defendant), at 08:30 AM in Department R, Marc D. Gross, Presiding; Case Management Conference - Not Held - Vacated by Court, JOHN SPAHI?S REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE THE PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM FROM THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; Filed by John Spahi (Defendant), Answer; Filed by Windsor Ocean, Inc. (Defendant), Proof of Personal Service; Filed by Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (Plaintiff), First Amended Complaint For: 1. Case Number: *******0918 Hearing Date: March 12, 2020 Dept: P. Plaintiff HOA alleges defendant Spahi used his position as the HOAs controlling director to engineer sham sale agreements under which the HOA sold units to Spahi and his alter egos for less than market value. Clients The HOA argues Windsors counsel, Pierce Bainbridge, assisted in the fraud by designating Spahis son Omar as Windsors PMQ, though he had no knowledge of Windsors structure or dealings, and by filing an answer that allegedly claimed Windsor followed corporate formalities. C4D~5}5?&R o*@RA?CJ$^S[sn 1ka8Yg/{Q~=Lx(:s>M\7?W Kt Joe Orlando was his henchman. 0000119652 00000 n DUE TO THE ONGOING COVID-19 PANDEMIC, PARTIES AND COUNSEL ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO AVOID IN-PERSON APPEARANCES AND TO APPEAR VIA COURT CALL WHENEVER POSSIBLE. Owners of more than 200 units filed individual actions and a putative class action was filed on behalf of the remaining unit owners. This action is stayed pending the outcome of the 2015 action. The first cause of action seeks to rescind the purchase agreements for the stolen units because consent to the agreements was obtained through duress, menace, fraud, and undue influence. FAC at 34. of Forestry & Fire Protection v. Howell (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 154, 191. "Prestige property at 201 Ocean Ave. has completed three years of litigation". I'm happy to . Franklin & Franklin v. 7-Eleven Owners for Fair Franchising (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 1168, 1175. The current action alleges Spahi is responsible for paying any judgment that may be awarded against the HOA arising from his alter egos purchase of the units, due to the purchase agreements indemnification provisions. Thus, Spahi argues, the cases are necessarily related, and the concurrent jurisdiction rule applies. The Pride LA 0000007824 00000 n Code of Civ. Case law states exclusive concurrent jurisdiction applies to conflicting adjudications of the same subject-matter by different departments of one court., The two cases do involve different defendants, different causes of action and different primary rights. 2022-03-17, Los Angeles County Superior Courts | Property | [2], Construction was halted in the summer of 2008. In 2015 Ocean Towers Housing Corporation (HOA) shareholder Michael Reach filed a derivative complaint, case no. Preliminary evaluation showed that the tower's core had sunk 14 to 16 inches (360 to 410mm), while the attached parking lot had shifted less than half that distance. Published March 2, 2018. Once the columns had been fully braced, then garage beams would be cut away and the foundation would be repaired. officers, directors, shareholders, when Windsor knew it had none. Yo! Courts determining whether a court has exclusive concurrent jurisdiction apply an expansive subject matter test which considers whether the two actions arise from the same transaction. Plant Insulation Co. v. Fireboard Corp. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 781, 789. 0000184083 00000 n %PDF-1.5 % The matter at hand is whether or not Ocean Towers had the right to pay attorney fees to protect its board of directors. The court recognized that Stone might have qualified for the privilege if he had made his statements in a letter to another interested party, but it determined that posting a statement on the Internet does not prove the required intent to reach a specific interested party. The purchase agreements contained indemnification provisions, under which buyers would indemnify the HOA. 2022-09-02, Los Angeles County Superior Courts | Property | Post author: Post published: June 10, 2022; Post category: do coyotes eat crows; Post comments: . Transbay Joint Powers Authority (TJPA), et al. Both the first cause of action here and the 2015 action are based on allegations that defendants misused their positions as HOA directors, forcing the HOA into fraudulent purchase agreements. By continuing to use this website, you agree to UniCourts General Disclaimer, Terms of Service, In 2008 construction was halted when large cracks were observed in parking garage walls and in beams in the hi-rise. . 0000010410 00000 n The lawsuit has nothing at all to do with these allegations. Code of Civ. Defendant seeks to stay this action, arguing the 2015 action seeks to recover litigation fees and expenses incurred in the bank lawsuits, while the instant action seeks contractual indemnification of the same fees and expenses. . TJPA is a public agency responsible for a newly constructed Transit Center adjacent to the Millennium Tower. Island Breeze. Welcome to the website of the Digital Media Law Project. endstream endobj startxref Proc. According to the Spahis, the Isens intended to induce other parties, including prospective buyers and tenants, not to deal with the Spahis. Plaintiff argues the rule only applies when different superior courts have jurisdiction over the cases in question. The two cases are being heard by different departments within a single superior court. The developers of the Ocean Tower condominiums on South Padre Island have filed suit in Cameron County, claiming fraud on behalf of three firms involved with the engineering and construction of the high-rise building. [9] Soon after, the building became known as the "leaning tower of South Padre" and was viewed as a looming eyesore.[6][10]. [5] Units were to retail for $2 million. ;128.7 (g). He argues a significant risk of contradictory rulings in the two actions and that a stay will not conflict with the courts prior demurrer ruling because the demurrer ruling was based on the primary right doctrine, whereas this motion seeks to apply the broader exclusive concurrent jurisdiction doctrine. If the conditions for exclusive concurrent jurisdiction exist, the issuance of a stay order is a matter of right. People ex rel Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc. (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 760, 772. endstream endobj 34 0 obj <> endobj 35 0 obj <> endobj 36 0 obj <>stream . 2022-02-14, California Courts Of Appeal | Other | 0000007669 00000 n (All Cash) Because the board was totally controlled by Spahi he would not approve our application for the co-op. A $125 million lawsuit over the failed . Information contained in this entry is current as of the last event mentioned in the "Description" section below; additional proceedings might have taken place in this matter since this event. A motion for sanctions brought for an improper purpose shall itself be subject to a motion for sanctions. Cal. [6][7][8] The official explanation was that the parking garage and the tower were mistakenly built connected, forcing the weight down upon the garage instead of on the tower's core. Spahi demurs to plaintiffs three causes of action, arguing the claims alleged must have been brought in the 2015 lawsuit due to the primary right doctrine. An attorney who files papers violating these requirements is subject to sanctions, including dismissal. We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. jakarta residence implosion 2009 dimulai.. CRESTWOOD HILLS ASSOCIATION VS JON M. LEADER, ET AL. When courts apply sanctions, they are generally to be imposed in an incremental approach, with terminating sanctions being the last resort. Dept. Spahi moves to stay the current action based on exclusive concurrent jurisdiction with the original action. The story goes that way back in the 90's, then mayor Ed Cyganiewicz came up with the idea of outlawing neckties as a way of promoting the laidback atmosphere on the island. There is a substantial danger that, if the lawsuits proceed separately, the courts could reach conflicting (or redundant) decisions regarding those damages. DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.. [12][13], Any materials that could be recycled or resold, including fixtures and fittings, steel, flooring, and windows, were removed from the building before demolition. Enjoy luxury . On December 22, 2006, Stone filed a motion to dismiss the suit under California's anti-SLAPP statute. trailer <<62DD41D1A9AC4D93B41AD3F841D72D45>]/Prev 870850>> startxref 0 %%EOF 124 0 obj <>stream CRAIG T. KOJIMA / [email protected]. Motion to Strike Punitive Damages Allegations. Comments 1 | Recommend 0 . 33 0 obj <> endobj Type: Other Statutes Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability. ocean tower lawsuit outcome. The prior demurrer ruling does not require denial of this motion. [6], After a month of structural testing the construction of Ocean Tower began on April 5, 2006. 0000184153 00000 n Central Tower Building1424-4th Street, Suite 310Santa Monica, CA 90401[emailprotected], Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation The podium of the building was a large parking garage with the homes beginning at 55 feet (17m) above sea level. Rel Garamendi v. American Autoplan, Inc. (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 760, 774. [10] At 9am on December 13, 2009, the building was imploded by Controlled Demolition, Inc. By the time it fell the building weighed 55,000 short tons (50,000t) and is reported to be the tallest and largest reinforced concrete structure ever imploded. According to the ruling, representatives of Isen Investments allegedly began defaming Spahi and conspiring to deflate the value of his real estate holdings after Spahi had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in December 2009. ;128.7(h). 0000305585 00000 n Declaration - DECLARATION OF HERBERT NACION RE: PAYMENT AND SUBMISSION OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION TO STATE BAR OF CA, Minute Order - MINUTE ORDER (CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DEFENDANT JOHN SPAHI'S DEMURRER -), Reply - JOHN SPAHIS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Reply - DEFENDANT JOHN SPAHIS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS REQUEST FOR JUDICAL NOTICE, Request for Judicial Notice - DEFENDANT JOHN SPAHIS SECOND REQUEST FOR JUDICAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS JOHN SPAHIS DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Reply - JOHN SPAHIS REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE THE PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM FROM THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Objection - OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT JOHN SPAHI'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE FILED IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Opposition - OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF OCEAN TOWERS HOUSING TO SPAHI'S DEMURRER TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Opposition - OPPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF OCEAN TOWERS HOUSING TO SPAHI'S MOTION TO STRIKE PUNITIVE CLAIM FROM FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, Response - RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF OCEAN TOWERS HOUSING CORPORATION'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE), Ex Parte Application - EX PARTE APPLICATION OF PLAINTIFF OCEAN TOWERS HOUSING CORPORATION'S FOR AN ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON JOHN SPAHI'S DEMURRER AND MOTION TO STRIKE REGARDING THE FIRST AMEND, Cases involving other agreements or torts not classified elsewhere, 190, 1190, 2190, 3190, 4190, 4194, 5190, 5196. Mr. Eggenberger fulfilled the requirements of CRC 9.40 and the application. 0000005896 00000 n his wife, Maria. Code of Civ. Court: Third Circuit New Jersey US District Court for the District of New Jersey. Central Tower Building1424-4th Street, Suite 310Santa Monica, CA 90401[emailprotected], Powered by ROAR Online Publication Software from Lions Light Corporation Though the developers initially vowed to fix the problem, studies discovered that repairs would have been too expensive, and plans for its demolition were announced in September 2009. Defendants argue Spahi was not a party to the purchase agreements.
Sanjay Narang Net Worth, Articles O